Friday, 19 November 2010

How Sustainable is my Community?



I have lived in New Duston for 18 years – my whole life. Living in the area for this amount of time has enabled me to judge how sustainable the area really is, as I am fully accustomed to the local economy and workings of the area.
I am going to split up sustainability into the pros and cons of the area, processes that make the area sustainable and things which could be done to improve local sustainability, looking at data for the local area acquired from the Office for National Statistics.
As the name suggests, New Duston is an area that was created prior to the original village. Therefore the houses are more modern which brings improved housing regulations and energy efficient building methods and materials. The majority of the houses have doubled glazed windows and doors which helps to lock warmth into the house therefore reducing the duration that the heating systems are used for, saving electricity. However with more modern settlements comes more technology and electricity consuming items. When looking at data for the consumption of electricity and Gas in New Duston (Figure 1) compared to the average for Northampton, East midlands and England, it is evident that the area uses substantial amounts.

 Figure 1

This may be due to the mainly younger population occupying the areas (Figure 2) who are more inclined to buy new ‘dirty’ energy inefficient products and be more wasteful than older residents due to their lifestyles; the need to keep up with trends i.e. buying the latest gadgets. The need to buy products to make life easier and a generally less thoughtful mind-set on being wasteful.

Figure 2
Recycling in New Duston is a practiced part of the community. Glass, plastic, paper, garden waste and general waste are all recycled with collections every Thursday. This is sustainable because the damage caused by the creation of the products we buy in Duston is being slightly reduced as the used materials are being recycled and reused.
There are also many bus stops in Duston, with regular public transport. Public transport is a major way that we can reduce our carbon footprint, and reduce emissions from cars by increasing the passenger ratio. Currently out of the 4370 working people in Duston, 248 travel by bus to work. This is a good start as it means potentially 248 individual cars are not being used each day and created emissions. However this is a small number, there are 4751 vans and cars in New Duston – lots of pollution In order for Duston to be more sustainable more people would have to be encouraged to use public transport. But the age of the population comes into play here as many of the population is young; and young people like to drive their cars as they are a large part of their life showing other people how successful they are.
Public services is also tied in with emissions and travel sustainability; new Duston has many services such as; several shops, several schools, hairdressers, florists, doctors, gyms, a dentists, pubs, restaurants, fast food shops, garages, household item shops and much more. This is sustainable because firstly it means that residents of new Duston do not have to travel miles to shopping facilities as they have them on their doorstep, this reduces the amount cars are used for and therefore emissions. Secondly it is also sustainable because the local area’s economy is being boosted when these services are used. The more the local services are used the more the local economy will grow and the more the local area will develop and flourish, and with development and money comes sustainability.
In light of all the pollution from vehicles and products in Duston, its carbon footprint can be said to be slightly reduced by the sizeable amount of green space. Duston contains 6 large parks of open grass space, trees and all of this uninterrupted by pollution. All of the areas release oxygen into the air with combats C02 levels. These spaces also make Duston sustainable because there are areas for children to play, people to socialise, events to take place, and this will always be available.

Thursday, 21 October 2010

Sustainability and Me.

Sustainability is a hard word to define, most people could tell you whether something is sustainable, yet they would struggle to give you the definition of why, this is mainly because it is split into social, economic and environmental sustainability and there are many criteria involved.
Today when the term sustainability is used it’s mainly in the environmental context. We are constantly being pressured into making our lifestyles more sustainable, told to recycle to reduce the use of resources, buy locally sourced food to reduce air miles, reduce electricity use to reduce the amount of energy produced through dirty polluting methods and buy cleaner products amongst many other things, all to 'reduce our carbon footprint' and 'save the world'. Individually we may be able to do our part with little effort, simply by turning off the light when we leave the room, washing our clothes on a colder cycle, turn the heating off and put a jumper on and walk to the local shops. However demographics show that this is an issue with so many individually thinking minds; we find it hard to realise how these little things are going to make a difference in such a big world, therefore in the majority people tend not to make the effort. In this ignorance it’s overlooked that if one person thinks this, everyone might, and the approach fails. If we are to become more sustainable, efforts must be made to involve demographic groups instead of individuals.

How sustainable am i? honestly?...... Not very.
I try to be sustainable where I can, but my lifestyle somewhat limits how sustainable I can be.
For example I currently live at home and have to travel 3 miles to and from university in my car, a very polluting  journey when you consider the traffic can mean its churning out CO2 for 45 minutes each way. I drive almost everywhere, my love for cars means I don’t want to walk when I could drive, very unsustainable I know, but at least I’m being honest!
At home we recycle all that can be recycled, cardboard, glass, plastic, clothes, shoes and electrical goods. However this does not make me feel better about myself, and neither does it really make me and my household more sustainable, because the goods were made In the first place, which created emissions and used resources. My mum turns of the heating and points to my hoodie collection, comes in the room and turns the light off leaving me in darkness and has had double glazing installed etc, this is partly to save her some money on the bills though – sustainability is not the main drive. However I must admit I am the thorn in her side. I leave lights on when I’m not in the room, leave the television on when I go out, leave my phone and laptop chargers plugged in whilst they’re not attached and ‘accidently’ sometimes put recyclables in the more convenient general waste bin.
My fairly unsustainable life I blame on my laziness and busy lifestyle. I could be much more sustainable if I tried to, and often vow to myself that I will…. I’ll start tomorrow I promise.

This blog focuses mainly on environmental sustainability as that is the main type concerned with geography and the one that is having the most adverse affects on the universe.
Environmental sustainability is now one of today’s major issues. Many people could be more sustainable but they fail to be, for lack of care and responsibility – the world wont end in their lifetime so it doesn’t effect them, for lack of time in their lives, or many because they purely cannot be very sustainable whilst living the life they live. In order to make a big difference to the world and reduce global warming, a huge effort needs to be made; governments need to create more incentives for being more sustainable. And somehow the message need to be drilled into peoples heads enough to make them change their ways and be more responsible for the world.
DEFRA - the Department for Environment Food and rural affairs has been measuring levels of sustainability worldwide since 1990. It uses 68 indicators to give a final indication of level of sustainability. It concludes that the UK'Compared with the position in 2003, 57 measures show improvement (representing over half of those for which it is possible to make an assessment), and 24 show little or no change.' DEFRA 2010, defra.gov.uk) However, many indicators stil need to be improved.
 Defra states that to increase national sustainability we must Reduce:
  • aviation emissions of greenhouse gases
  • shipping emissions of greenhouse gases
  • carbon dioxide emissions from road freight
  • carbon dioxide emissions from the service sector
  • energy supply (consumption exceeding UK production)
  • farmland bird populations
  • community participation
  • range of life expectancy between local authorities
  • walking and cycling
  • households living in fuel poverty
Source: http://www.defra.gov.uk/sustainable/government/progress/policy-monitoring/all.htm

Image below shows conclusion in pie chart form of the indicators (http://www.defra.gov.uk/sustainable/government/progress/policy-monitoring/all.htm


The report of sustainability from DEFRA can be found at:
http://www.defra.gov.uk/sustainable/government/progress/documents/SDI2010_001.pdf